Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 04:58

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Real TikTokers are pretending to be Veo 3 AI creations for fun, attention - Ars Technica
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Japan’s oldest “human” fossils aren’t human at all, says new study - Glass Almanac
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Newspaper headlines: Spending Review 'renewing Britain' or 'reckless splurge' - BBC
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Rocks reveal the turning point when oxygen changed Earth forever - Earth.com
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
How do you fight the push and pull (manipulation) tactic if you want to win him?